Maybe you have heard someone saying “ why the rich just don’t give part of the goods in order to finish poverty”, well the truth is that it’s not that easy, and even if we were able to redistribute all the resources around the world, this will not have as result at the end of poverty.
But why is this, what are the arguments that validated this point of view? Is this just a supposition? or is it the fact that just the share of goods is enough to end inequality?
If we suddenly redistribute all the world’s resources, it won’t lead to the end of inequality and this could even produce the greatest division beaten by those that control other kinds of assets
There is not an easy way to end poverty, since this phenomenon is cause not but one but by a different variety of factors that are systematic within society, things like lack of healthcare, corruption, neglect of education, and a productive system, are some of those factors that we need to understand in order to have a perspective of the complexity of the issue.
There are other factors such as economic and political stability, the system of values that is working inside a specific society, what includes the social structure of these.
Money alone can’t create self-sufficiency, Under these circumstances, we are not giving real opportunities to the people to increase their life quality but to be dependent on the aid that they are receiving, we need to empower our society, giving them aid to have a minimum quality of life, food shelter, water, internet, but understanding the only way to make a change in the long term is via the proper education, one that teaches people how to become self-sufficient.
+58-412- 398- 7470
Find new interesting articles and information about the Association